Amputation
Also: limb amputation, surgical amputation
The surgical removal of a limb or part of one, for most of history a choice between losing the limb and losing the patient to bleeding or infection.
Questions this entry answers
- Why were so many wounded soldiers' limbs amputated?
- How were amputations done before anaesthesia?
- How many amputations were performed after the Halifax Explosion?
Definition
Amputation is the surgical removal of all or part of a limb. Historically it was done when a limb was crushed, shattered by a weapon, frozen or gangrenous, and the surgeon judged that keeping it would kill the patient. It is one of the oldest operations in the medical record.
Historical context
The Roman medical writer Celsus, in the first century AD, describes amputating through sound tissue rather than leaving diseased tissue behind, and tying off severed vessels with linen thread and iron clamps in limb amputation. In the sixteenth century the French surgeon Ambroise Paré argued for tying off vessels instead of sealing them with hot iron.
Two later changes altered the odds more than any cutting technique. General anaesthesia, with ether from 1846 and chloroform soon after, ended the need for speed above all else. Antisepsis, from the late 1860s, began to reduce deaths from infection in the days after.
How it worked
- The decision. A crushed limb, a fracture with bone through the skin, or spreading gangrene usually meant the limb came off. Waiting could mean losing the patient.
- Bleeding. A band or tourniquet above the site slowed blood loss, and the cut vessels were tied off.
- The cut. Skin and muscle were divided, the bone sawn through, and soft tissue drawn over the end to form a stump.
- The days after. Infection, renewed bleeding and fever killed many patients who had survived the operation itself.
Methods varied by era, by surgeon, and by where the operation was done: a hospital, a tent or a floor.
What it meant for the patient, the soldier, the civilian
Before anaesthesia the patient was awake, and assistants held them still. After it, the stump took weeks to heal, and the risk of infection did not end when the surgeon put down the saw.
Then came life with one limb. A labourer, a soldier or a child had to relearn work, walking and balance, often with an artificial limb that fit badly or not at all. The operation took minutes. What it changed lasted the rest of their lives.
Examples from history
- Halifax, December 1917. Local hospitals performed 25 amputations after the explosion, according to McAlister and colleagues. In the same disaster 249 eyes were removed. The comparison shows how much of the damage fell on faces and eyes.
- The American Civil War, 1861–1865. The soft lead bullets of the period shattered bone, and amputation was the most common major operation for limb wounds. Most were done under chloroform or ether.
Sources
- Sources listed
- 3
- Checked against the source
- 0
- Not yet checked
- 3
Primary source
Celsus. De Medicina. Trans. W. G. Spencer. Loeb Classical Library, 3 vols. Harvard University Press, 1935–1938.
Ligature passage cited in the Rome research notes as V.26.21; amputation in Book VII.
Not yet checked against the source
Scholarly secondary source
McAlister, C. N., Murray, T. J., Lakosha, H., Maxner, C. E. "The Halifax disaster (1917). Eye injuries and their care." British Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;91:832–5. View source
Not yet checked against the sourceKirkup, John. A History of Limb Amputation. Springer, 2007.
Not yet checked against the source
Know a better source or see an error? Send a correction.